Your
question is very timely, as a
recent article in the British
journal Gut showed that patients
who initially had an abnormal
biopsy but continued to ingest
gluten had the biopsy return to
normal.
However,
the clinical manifestations of
the disease continued, bringing
into question our so-called “gold
standard” for diagnosing
celiac disease: an abnormal biopsy
that returns to normal after gluten
restriction. The
point is that one does not necessarily
need to have abnormal villi to
have symptoms of celiac disease.
There
are other points to consider:
did your doctor obtain at least
8 biopsies of your duodenum on
the repeat study? The disease
is very patchy and can be missed
with one biopsy. Even on a single
villus, there may be an uneven
distribution of inflammatory cells.
Was the initial biopsy well-oriented?
Tangentially-cut sections of the
biopsy can look like villus flattening,
when there really wasn’t
any.
If
everything was done correctly,
then you must have imaging studies
of the rest of your small intestine,
and a colonoscopy, because, given
your family history, and current
symptoms, you may be at increased
risk for bowel cancer. Best wishes
to you.
Health
and happiness,
Dr. Aron, NOVEMBER
16 , 2007 |